The Last Exorcism – Review

The Last Exorcism

Directed by Daniel Stamm. Starring Patrick Fabian, Ashley Bell, Iris Bahr.

The success at the box office of a film like “the Last Exorcism” can only prove one thing: there’s still a great hunger for horror out there… and it doesn’t matter if it’s good or not. There have probably been worse films but this takes the crown as the biggest letdown of them. For a short
moment I really thought the film could have become one of the defining horror of the decade, but, sadly, the things that are wrong with
it, mainly in the last act, are SO BAD that somehow they manage to ruin everything and eventually plunge this film into the “pit of catastrophe”, despite some good performances ere and there.

In order to prove my point I am going to have to spoil the hell out of it, so if you haven’t seen it or
you’re planning to waste… erm.. sorry, I meant “to spend”, 90 minutes of your precious life watching it, then stop reading right now.

“The last Exorcism” is actually a clever spin on the usual exorcist fare, but more than that it is the latest entry into that much exhausted “found footage” genre started off by Blair Witch 12 years ago (My God, has it been that long already?) .

The film is produced by Eli Roth who in the last few years has created a name for himself, with titles like Cabin Fever and the infamous Hostel, for pushing the boundaries of taste and gore. This time the “shock factor” is kept down to a minimum, which is what makes the first part of the film quite intriguing and succesful. Because of its premise the film manages to put to rest right from the start the ever-ending question of a type of mockumentary like this (Blair Witch Project, REC, Cloverfield and Paranormal Activity): why would the characters keep on filming, despite everything that’s happening? Would they actually been filming that instead of running away or saving their butts? It’s the sort of thing that usually annoys the hell out of me and pushes our suspension of disbelieve to absurd levels. In this case the plot requires the cameraman to actually film everything that’s going on.

A disillusioned evangelical minister, after years of performing exorcisms, decides to be filmed for a documentary exposing the fraud of exorcisms, proving that they do not really exist and it’s actually all in the heads of the people who think they are possessed… So far so good. The whole beginning of the film actually made me hope for something quite good: a new and intriguing take on the seen-before theme of exorcism.

However the film fails to keep it real by constantly breaking the rules of “mokumentary”, by having reverse angles, by adding sound effects and,
worse of all, a cheap music score underneath which goes for the cheap jumps out of your seats. Am I watching something which is
supposed to be real, or just a cheap heavy handled, tricksy, manipulative piece which doesn’t really care for its integrity but just wants to make me jump every time somebody goes “booo” on the screen?

It is a real shame, because I really thought this was working up to a certain point. And finally, a couple of words about the ending of the film, which is one of the most awful ending I can ever remember. It is so bad that it actually makes you forget all the good things you’ve seen up until that point.

I haven’t yet met a single person or read a single review that hasn’t actually mention how terrible it is!! How can that happen? Either they got cold feet and changed their mind at the last moment or they must be really stupid to even think for a moment that the audience could buy into something so stupid. They wanted to do a “Rosmary’s Baby” type of twist, without realizing that Rosmary’s Baby actually builds up for two hours towards the revelation. This one feels just like a last-minute turn.

In a way  “The last Exorcism” is the type of film that doesn’t really work for any kind of audience: the avid horror fans will get disappointed by the lack of “action” and “gore” (the marketing campaign is incredibly misleading!!), the people who like good storytelling and good twists (the Sixth sense fans) will hate its clunky turn and awful ending. All the others people who never really liked horror films will find no redeeming feature in this either.

The DVD and BlueRay has just come out and it’s packed with Special Features including 3 types of commentary tracks. It will be interesting to know if we learn anything more to explain how such bad ending was conceived. If anyone has listen to those commentaries or seen the many special features available, please let me know. I am not giving a single extra dime to Ely Roth.
5/10

 

OTHER RELATED REVIEWS:

Let Me In

Shutter Island

About these ads

About MovieGeek
Movie-lover, movie-eater, movie-maker, movie-studier, Movie-Geek!

14 Responses to The Last Exorcism – Review

  1. beckylucas says:

    Great review with a lot of valid points and I agree the ending was one of the worst in horror history! However, I am one of the avid horror fans you speak of and yet I really enjoyed it (up until the last 15mins of course :P). Great blog by the way!!

    • moviegeek says:

      Thanks so much for your comment. By the way, I am an avid horror fan too, which is probably why I got so annoyed by the film: as I said, it really could have been the defining horror of the decade. Instead it will be remembered as “that film with that terrible ending”… ;)

      • beckylucas says:

        Haha so true!!

  2. Maybe it was Roth’s eight year old son’s birthday, so he let him write the ending. (HA!) It sure felt like a kid wrote it. And, unfortunately, this movie will probably be forgotten altogether rather than remembered as the film with a bad ending.

    • moviegeek says:

      Good point. So let me re-phrase it: “… vaguely remembered as the film with the very bad ending” ;)

  3. Pingback: The Last Exorcism – Review (via moviegeekblog) | The Calculable

  4. I think most people would agree with you. I did a collaborative article with 2 other bloggers last month on alternate endings and how some movies should’ve ended…one of the picks was this film. Check it out if you wish. http://scarletsp1der.wordpress.com/2010/12/15/it-shouldve-ended-this-way/ How do you think this film should’ve ended?

  5. Modest Movie says:

    I kinda liked the ending actually…

  6. I enjoyed this movie more than most people. I thought it was great up until the last 15 minutes. There were some solid thrills like the scene when the girl followed the crew at a motel. For me, the ending wasn’t enough to warrant a bad review.

    • moviegeek says:

      It’s interesting how this film really split the audience. I was obviously very annoyed by its lack of conviction and the fact that the film didn’t stay true to its premises (with the use of sound and music for cheap thrills). The introductions of the villagers towards the last part of the film just to justify that terrible ending for pretty lame. However I will probably watch it again sometime and hopefully revise my harsh review. It does happen sometimes.
      Thanks for your message.

  7. rainfalls says:

    i have not seen this film i have herd that this film is the remake of the exorcist

    • moviegeek says:

      Remake?!? Not really. Actually it’s got really nothing to do with it.

  8. rainfalls says:

    WHAT?!?!?!?!?!?!

  9. Pingback: Troll Hunter – Review « MovieGeekBlog

What do you think? Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 779 other followers

%d bloggers like this: